https://mecanik.dev/en/tags/automation/Recent content in Automation on [ MECANIK DEV ]Hugo -- gohugo.ioenCopyright © 2020-{year} by [ MECANIK DEV ]. All Rights Reserved.Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:00:00 +0100https://mecanik.dev/en/posts/ci-cd-pipeline-best-practices-for-uk-development-teams-in-2026/Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:00:00 +0100https://mecanik.dev/en/posts/ci-cd-pipeline-best-practices-for-uk-development-teams-in-2026/Interest in CI/CD automation has grown consistently over the past three years, and search volume for “CI/CD pipeline setup” rose 34% in 2025 alone. Despite that, the majority of UK development agencies still deploy via manual SSH sessions or ad-hoc scripts. That gap represents a significant competitive disadvantage: teams with mature CI/CD pipelines ship roughly five times more frequently and catch bugs at a stage where fixes are ten times cheaper than post-deployment remediation.https://mecanik.dev/en/posts/ai-code-review-how-to-automate-quality-control-in-2026/Mon, 22 Jun 2026 07:00:00 +0100https://mecanik.dev/en/posts/ai-code-review-how-to-automate-quality-control-in-2026/AI code review has moved from experimental to production-standard in 2026. Development teams that once debated whether AI could reliably review code are now debating which tool to use and how deeply to integrate it. The quality of AI-generated code review has improved to the point where, for many categories of finding, it outperforms a tired human reviewer working under time pressure. This guide explains how AI code review works, what it reliably catches, how to integrate it into a real CI/CD pipeline, and how the leading tools compare.